In order to avoid relativism, Galmater took a strategy of augumentation stressing the logical function of categorial duality, which drew concern from many a philosopher.

伽达默尔为规避相而采取的范畴二重性逻辑功能的论证策略引起众多哲学家的关注。

It is often thought that pluralism in ethics goes hand in hand with ethical relativism, and that, conversely, a non-relativist view of morality entails a monolithic kind of moral absolutism.

通常认为，德多元论与德相论是并行不悖的，与之相反，一个非相性的德观念则意味著某种一成 不变的德绝。

In order to avoid relativism, Galmater took a strategy of augumentation stressing the logical function of categorial duality, which drew concern from many a philosopher.

伽达默尔为规避相对义的范畴二重性逻辑功能的论证策略引起众多哲学家的关注。

It is often thought that pluralism in ethics goes hand in hand with ethical relativism, and that, conversely, a non-relativist view of morality entails a monolithic kind of moral absolutism.

通常认为，道德多元论与道德相对论是并行不悖的，与之相反，一个非相对性的道德观念则意味著某种一成 不变的道德绝对义。

In order to avoid relativism, Galmater took a strategy of augumentation stressing the logical function of categorial duality, which drew concern from many a philosopher.

伽达默尔为规避相对主而采取范畴二重性逻辑功能策略引起众多哲学家关注。

It is often thought that pluralism in ethics goes hand in hand with ethical relativism, and that, conversely, a non-relativist view of morality entails a monolithic kind of moral absolutism.

通常认为，道德多元与道德相对是并行不悖，与之相反，一个非相对性道德观念则意味著某种一成 不变道德绝对主。

In order to avoid relativism, Galmater took a strategy of augumentation stressing the logical function of categorial duality, which drew concern from many a philosopher.

伽达默尔规避主义而采取的范畴二重性逻辑功能的论证策略引起众多哲学家的关注。

It is often thought that pluralism in ethics goes hand in hand with ethical relativism, and that, conversely, a non-relativist view of morality entails a monolithic kind of moral absolutism.

通，道德多元论与道德论是并行不悖的，与之反，一个非性的道德观念则意味著某种一成 不变的道德绝主义。

In order to avoid relativism, Galmater took a strategy of augumentation stressing the logical function of categorial duality, which drew concern from many a philosopher.

伽达默尔为规避相对而采取二重性逻辑功能论证策略引起众多哲学家关注。

It is often thought that pluralism in ethics goes hand in hand with ethical relativism, and that, conversely, a non-relativist view of morality entails a monolithic kind of moral absolutism.

通常认为，道德多元论与道德相对论是并行不悖，与之相反，一个非相对性道德观念则意味著某种一成 不变道德绝对。

In order to avoid relativism, Galmater took a strategy of augumentation stressing the logical function of categorial duality, which drew concern from many a philosopher.

伽达默尔为规避相对主义而采取的范畴二重性逻辑功能的论证策略引起众多哲学家的关注。

It is often thought that pluralism in ethics goes hand in hand with ethical relativism, and that, conversely, a non-relativist view of morality entails a monolithic kind of moral absolutism.

通常认为，道德多元论与道德相对论是并行不悖的，与之相反，一个非相对性的道德观念则意味著某种一成 不变的道德绝对主义。

In order to avoid relativism, Galmater took a strategy of augumentation stressing the logical function of categorial duality, which drew concern from many a philosopher.

伽达默尔为规避相对义而采取的重性逻辑功能的论证策略引起众多哲学家的关注。

It is often thought that pluralism in ethics goes hand in hand with ethical relativism, and that, conversely, a non-relativist view of morality entails a monolithic kind of moral absolutism.

通常认为，道德多元论与道德相对论是并行不悖的，与之相反，一个非相对性的道德观念则意味著某种一成 不变的道德绝对义。

In order to avoid relativism, Galmater took a strategy of augumentation stressing the logical function of categorial duality, which drew concern from many a philosopher.

伽达默尔为规避主义而采取的范畴二重性逻辑功能的论证策略引起众多哲学家的关注。

It is often thought that pluralism in ethics goes hand in hand with ethical relativism, and that, conversely, a non-relativist view of morality entails a monolithic kind of moral absolutism.

通常认为，道德多元论与道德论是并行不悖的，与之反，一个非性的道德观念则意味著某种一成 不变的道德绝主义。

In order to avoid relativism, Galmater took a strategy of augumentation stressing the logical function of categorial duality, which drew concern from many a philosopher.

伽达默尔为规避相对义的范畴二重性逻辑功能的论证策略引起众多哲学家的关注。

It is often thought that pluralism in ethics goes hand in hand with ethical relativism, and that, conversely, a non-relativist view of morality entails a monolithic kind of moral absolutism.

通常认为，道德多元论与道德相对论是并行不悖的，与之相反，一个非相对性的道德观念则意味著某种一成 不变的道德绝对义。