He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他言的强烈信仰者。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有言。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义的衣而上宗教保守主义的衣，不过箝制言的观，并不能促进言。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”的作者。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是言论自由的强烈信仰。

We have freedom of speech .

有言论自由。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义的衣而换上宗教保守主义的衣，不过是换了箝制言论自由的观，并不能促进言论自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言论自由捍卫罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小写过“诽谤书籍”的作。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是言论自由的烈信仰者。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有言论自由。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权的衣而换上宗教保守的衣，不过是换了箝制言论自由的观，并不能促进言论自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言论自由捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”的作者。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是言论自由强烈信仰者。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有言论自由。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权衣而换上宗教保守衣，不过是换了箝制言论自由观，并不能促进言论自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言论自由捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”作者。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是言论的强烈信仰者。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有言论。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权义的衣而换上宗教义的衣，不过是换了箝制言论的观，并不能促进言论。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言论卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”的作者。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是自由的强烈信仰者。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有自由。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义的衣而换上宗教保守主义的衣，不过是换自由的观，并不能促自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、自由捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”的作者。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他自由的强烈信仰。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有自由。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义的衣而换上宗教保守主义的衣，不过换了箝制自由的观，并不能促进自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、自由捍卫罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”的。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是论自由的强烈信仰者。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有论自由。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱下政治极权主义的衣而换上宗教保守主义的衣，不过是换了论自由的观，并不能论自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、论自由捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，出版社之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”的作者。

He's a fervent believer in free speech.

他是言论自由的强烈信仰者。

We have freedom of speech .

我们有言论自由。

Refusing the straightjacket of political totalitarianism only to put on the straightjaket of religious conservative totalitarianism merely changes the design of the gag not its effectiveness.

脱极权主义的衣而换上宗教保守主义的衣，不过是换了箝制言论自由的观，并不能促进言论自由。

And as Floyd Abrams, an American lawyer and free-speech defender, notes, a book publisher, for example, will still be nervous about an author who has written a “libellous book”.

美国律师、言论自由捍卫者罗伊德•阿勃拉姆斯强调，版之流依然要小心那些写过“诽谤书籍”的作者。